Showing posts with label Fair Debt Collection Practices Act. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Fair Debt Collection Practices Act. Show all posts

Friday, April 28, 2017

Another Scam Debt Collection Email

Here is another email to one of my clients from: collectiondepartment.legal@gmail.com.



If you are getting similar emails, KEEP IN MIND - anything from a Gmail, Yahoo, Hotmail or other FREE email account is bogus. There will be no legitimate collection activities coming from a free email account.

In fact, collectiondepartment.legal@gmail.com has been used for some time and we should be close to finding out the owner's identity. The trick to filing an FDCPA lawsuit against these bottom feeders, is finding them first.

 Case File#PSH-095-25-AD
The District Courthouse
Due Amount- $496.36
Settlement Offer- $215.00
Last Date- Over
Lawsuit File Cost-$8569.00

Attorney Details,
Name-Victoria Kimble
ID-350783009
Sr. Attorney in District Court

Hereby we inform that you are obliged to come as a defendant to District Court of Appeals on May 8th, 2017, at 11:00 a.m. for the hearing of your case of defaulting on a LOAN, CASE PSH-095-25-AD.



If necessary you have a right to obtain a lawyer for your protection. You are kindly asked to have an identity document with you. Personal appearance is compulsory. Please bring all documents and witnesses relating to this case with you to Court on your hearing date.

Case information and courthouse address will be sent to your mailing address in next three to Five business days.

Note: If you do not attend the hearing the judge may hear the case in your absence.


Important Note: This is a copy of Case File which we have received from our Attorney today and we would like to inform you that if you pay 215.00 today, we will call our Attorney in order to cancel this procedure against you. This is your final chance to pay this debt and if you are failed to do that, the action will be activated. Once we receive your payment, the Court Clearance Certificate will be issued stating that this Case File is closed permanently.

Thank You.

AND - Another Debt Collection Scam Email right here 


Related Posts: Debt Collection Bottom Feeder Text Messages

Credit Repair Franchise Opportunityhttps://www.crafranchise.com

Visit the Credit Restoration Associates Website  
Back to the CRA blog homepage:Credit Repair Va:
CRA Resources:
Credit Repair:
About CRA:




Friday, March 10, 2017

Debt Collection Bottom Feeder Text Messages

Here is a cell phone screen shot sent in by one of my clients. The ex significant other took out some internet payday loans in my client's name.

Eventually, the defaulted loans get sold to "bottom feeders" who will never stop the harassment. Keep in mind, that the FDCPA and the Telemarketing Sales Rule regulates this kind of behavior, but we still have to find them to serve a lawsuit.



It is hard to track down these scammers when they use Google Voice or VOIP phone numbers to call and text from.

The take away from this, is that you absolutely have nothing to be afraid of if someone is 1. texting you and 2. if English is definitely not their primary language.

It is kind of funny actually. If this is happening to you, try to laugh it off, and DO NOT return the text.

Credit Repair Franchise Opportunityhttps://www.crafranchise.com

Visit the Credit Restoration Associates Website  
Back to the CRA blog homepage:Credit Repair Va:
CRA Resources:
Credit Repair:
About CRA:

Wednesday, March 8, 2017

Scam Debt Collector Bottom Feeders

A current client forwarded this email to me. First  a scammer will always use a non-traceable email address such as Gmail or Hotmail.

For fun, see how many grammatical, spelling and format errors you can find in this message as well as completely inaccurate information. Lol.


 Sent from my iPhone

Begin forwarded message:
From: National Collection Bureau <nationalcollection.usa@gmail.com>
Date: March 8, 2017 at 1:55:53 PM EST
To: National Collection Bureau <nationalcollection.usa@gmail.com>
Subject: Final Notification_Lawsuit Case File#JMD-01147791-SC
FINAL NOTICE FOR FAIR ACTION
(Fair Debt Collection Act-811[15 USC 1692i])
Case File#JMD-01147791-SC 

Last Date to File Lawsuit- March 10th 2017.
Cost of the Lawsuit-5825.35
Courthouse Address-NYC Civil Court(89-17 Sutphin Blvd, New York, NY 10038).
Legal Charges-Section 19(A), Clause 21(US).
Case Format- Fair Debt Collection Act 811 (FC/SC)
Due Amount-$556.00

Dear Debtor,

This is to notify you and requires your immediate attention.
We are going to file a lawsuit in next 24 hours at  NYC Civil Court (89-17 Sutphin Blvd, New York, NY 10038).against your Name and SSN. After giving several notifications we did not received any response from your side. We will consider that you are ignoring this matter and you want to dispute. We are in a process to inform the Social Security Administration & major Credit Bureaus as well.
If we do not hear from you today, we will be compelled to seek legal representation in the Court House. We reserve the right to commence litigation for intent to commit wire fraud under the pretense of refusing to repay a debt committed to, by use of the Internet. In addition we reserve the right to seek recovery for the balance due, as well as legal fees and any court cost incurred. 
Note:If we don't get any response from your side, we shall have no alternative but to take action through the local County Courthouse to recover the amount due together with court costs and legal fees including all taxes which cost approximately $5825.35. 
Note: The Legal Charges Section 19(A), Clause 21(US) is against you and if you ignore this case then our legal department will take immediate action you.
If we receive the remaining payment from you thereafter we will provide you full and final receipt stating that your case file is closed permanently with remaining zero balance. Don't take this matters lightly otherwise once the case file is downloaded thereafter we won't be able to help you out.
If you fail to respond us the Charges will be pressed against the name are: 
1. Violation of federal banking regulation act 1983 (C)
2. Collateral check fraud
3. Theft by deception (ACC ACT 21A) 
Which carries a maximum sentence of 3 years of prison and a fine up to $5825.35 !
YOU CAN APPLY FOR AN OUT OF COURT RESOLVE OPTION (OOCR): All you do is email us back for taking care of this matter outside the court house. 
PS. If you fail to respond within 24 hours this Legal Action will be activated. You will be Entitle for an OOCR, so please EMAIL us back ASAP. 
By requesting an offer in compromise, but if you are failed to do that then we shall start the process of pressing those charges against you. 
To resolve this issue ASAP,
Kindly emails us immediately.
Thanks&Regards,
ACS Incorporation.

My response:

I emailed back and offered to "settle this alleged debt in full" for $50.00. They immediately countered at $100.00 and asked that I send an account number for a $100 pre-paid Amazon.com gift card back to this email address. The logic was "we don't want your banking information, we understand that it might make you feel uncomfortable giving your banking information to a collection agency. Go to  https://www.amazon.com/gift-cards, (affiliate info removed) and purchase a card for $100. Then gift it to us at this email address and send us the confirmation from Amazon". What a complete scam.

The shame is that people probably fall for it.

Visit the Credit Restoration Associates Website  
Back to the CRA blog homepage:Credit Repair Va:
CRA Resources:
Credit Repair:
About CRA:

Thursday, July 9, 2015

CFPB, 47 States and D.C. Take Action Against JPMorgan Chase for Selling Bad Credit Card Debt and Robo-Signing Court Documents

Chase Ordered to Overhaul Debt Sales and Halt Collections on 528,000 Consumers’ Accounts.

Awesome!!!


WASHINGTON, D.C. – Today the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and Attorneys General in 47 states and the District of Columbia took action against JPMorgan Chase for selling bad credit card debt and illegally robo-signing court documents. The CFPB and states found that Chase sold “zombie debts” to third-party debt buyers, which include accounts that were inaccurate, settled, discharged in bankruptcy, not owed, or otherwise not collectible. The order requires Chase to document and confirm debts before selling them to debt buyers or filing collections lawsuits. Chase must also prohibit debt buyers from reselling debt and is barred from selling certain debts. Chase is ordered to permanently stop all attempts to collect, enforce in court, or sell more than 528,000 consumers’ accounts. Chase will pay at least $50 million in consumer refunds, $136 million in penalties and payments to the CFPB and states, and a $30 million penalty to the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) in a related action.
“Chase sold bad credit card debt and robo-signed documents in violation of law,” said CFPB Director Richard Cordray. “Today we are ordering Chase to permanently halt collections on more than 528,000 accounts and overhaul its debt-sales practices. We will continue to be vigilant in taking action against deceptive debt sales and collections practices that exploit consumers.”
Chase Bank, USA N.A. and its subsidiary Chase BankCard Services, Inc. are based in Newark, Del. and provide consumers with credit card accounts. From 2009 to 2013, when consumers defaulted on debts, Chase attempted to collect by contacting consumers, filing collections lawsuits, and selling accounts to third-party debt buyers. When Chase sold accounts, it provided debt buyers with an electronic sale file containing certain basic information about the debts from Chase’s internal databases, which the debt buyers used to collect on the debts. Chase was also responsible for preparing affidavits to verify debts when it or its debt buyers filed lawsuits to collect on defaulted credit card debts.
The CFPB found that Chase violated the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act’s prohibitions against unfair, deceptive, or abusive acts and practices. Chase sold faulty and false debts to third-party collectors, including accounts with unlawfully obtained judgments, inaccurate balances, and paid-off balances. Chase also sold debts that were owed by deceased borrowers. Chase also filed misleading debt-collections lawsuits against consumers using robo-signed and illegally sworn statements to obtain false or inaccurate judgments for unverified debts. Specifically, the CFPB and states found that Chase:
  • Sold bad debts to third-party debt buyers: Chase sold certain accounts that had already been settled by agreement, paid in full, discharged in bankruptcy, identified as fraudulent and not owed by the debtor, subject to an agreed-upon payment plan, no longer owned by Chase, or that were otherwise no longer enforceable. Chase also sold debts with missing or erroneous information such as whether the debt had been paid and the amount owed.
  • Assisted third-party debt buyers in deceptively collecting debt: By selling inaccurate or uncollectable debts, Chase subjected certain consumers to debt collection by its debt buyers on accounts that were not theirs, in amounts that were incorrect or uncollectable. Chase knew, or should have known, that third-party debt buyers would seek to collect these faulty debts. Therefore, by providing inadequate or incorrect information, Chase assisted debt buyers in deceptive collection activities.
  • Robo-signed affidavits to sue consumers for unverified debt: Chase filed more than 528,000 debt collections lawsuits against consumers and provided more than 150,000 sworn statements to debt buyers for their collections lawsuits against consumers, often using robo-signed documents. In doing so, Chase systematically failed to prepare, review, and execute truthful statements as required by law. Chase also made calculation errors when filing debt collection lawsuits that sometimes resulted in judgments against consumers for incorrect amounts. Chase failed to notify consumers and the courts once it learned of these problems.

Enforcement Action

Pursuant to the Dodd-Frank Act, the CFPB has the authority to take action against institutions or individuals engaging in unfair, deceptive, or abusive acts or practices or that otherwise violate federal consumer financial laws. Chase suspended collections litigation in 2011 and stopped selling debts in 2013. The CFPB and state actions provide relief for injured consumers, prohibit Chase from reviving its unlawful practices, and impose penalties for Chase’s law violations. Specifically, the order requires Chase to:
  • Cease collecting on 528,000 accounts: Chase cannot collect, enforce in court, sell, or transfer debts for consumers whose Chase credit card accounts were sent to collections litigation between January 1, 2009 to June 30, 2014. If Chase previously obtained a court judgment requiring consumers to pay the debt, Chase will notify the consumer that they will not try to collect, enforce, or sell the judgment. Chase will also contact the three major credit reporting companies to request that the judgments not be reported against consumers. These accounts had an original face value estimated at several billion dollars when Chase sent them to collections litigation. The actual market value is now estimated in the tens or hundreds of millions of dollars. Debt relief of this kind permanently protects consumers from any further collections and judgments on these accounts.
  • Pay at least $50 million in cash redress to consumers: Chase will pay cash refunds to consumers against whom collections litigation was pending between January 1, 2009 and June 30, 2014, for amounts paid above what the consumer owed when the debt was referred for litigation, plus 25 percent of the excess amount paid.
  • Prohibit debt buyers from reselling accounts: Chase must require by contract or agreement that debt buyers cannot resell debts purchased from Chase, unless to sell back to Chase.
  • Confirm debt before selling to debt buyers: Chase cannot sell debts that have been paid, settled, discharged, or are otherwise uncollectable. Prior to sale, Chase must provide account-level documentation to debt buyers confirming that the debts are accurate and enforceable. For a minimum of three years after selling the debt, Chase must make certain additional account information available to debt buyers including agreements, statements, and dispute records.
  • Notify consumers that their debt has been sold and make their account information available to them: Chase must notify consumers when their account is sold and reveal who purchased the account, the amount owed at the time of sale, and that consumers can request further information about their accounts at no charge.
  • Not sell zombie debts and other specified debts: Chase may not sell debts that do not have the required documentation, have been charged off for over three years or where the consumer has not paid for three years, are in litigation, are owed by a servicemember, are owed by someone who is deceased, or where the debtor has a payment plan.
  • Withdraw, dismiss, or terminate collections litigation: Chase will withdraw, dismiss, or terminate all pre-judgment collections litigation pending at any time after January 1, 2009.
  • Stop robo-signing affidavits: Declarations must be signed by hand, must reflect the actual date of signing, and must be based on the direct knowledge of the person signing and their review of Chase’s business records. Supporting documents submitted for debt collection litigation must be actual records of the debt, verified to be accurate, and not created solely for litigation.
  • Verify debts when filing a lawsuit: When filing collections lawsuits, Chase is required to submit specific information associated with the debt including the name of the creditor at the time of the last payment, the date of the last extension of credit, the date of the last payment, the amount of debt owed, and a breakdown of any post-charge-off interest and fees.
  • Pay $30 million civil penalty: Chase will pay a fine for its unlawful debt sales and robo-signing practices.
Chase must also implement policies, procedures, systems, and controls to ensure compliance with federal consumer financial laws when selling and collecting debts.
The Bureau is joined by 47 states and the District of Columbia in today’s action. The Bureau also worked in coordination with the OCC, which entered into a related agreement with Chase in 2013. The total relief to consumers includes debt relief associated with halting collections on more than 528,000 consumers’ accounts and at least $50 million in refunds. The amount of penalties and payments to states includes a $30 million civil penalty paid to the CFPB, a $30 million civil penalty paid to the OCC on the related matter, and $106 million in payments to states.
###

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is a 21st century agency that helps consumer finance markets work by making rules more effective, by consistently and fairly enforcing those rules, and by empowering consumers to take more control over their economic lives. For more information, visit consumerfinance.gov.





Sunday, October 21, 2012

Fair Credit Lawsuits WAY up in 2012. Why?

Headline and news outline by credit master and expert witness: John Ulzheimer

2012 continues to be a busy year for FCRA lawsuits, FCRA lawyers and FCRA expert witnesses says Ulzheimer.

According to WebRecon, a Michigan based Litigant Data tracking bureau, FCRA lawsuits are up 15% year to date in 2012 over the same time period (January through September) in 2011.

And while the pace of lawsuits has slowed considerably (at one time they were up over 90% year to date compared to 2011) 2012 is still shaping up to meet or exceed 2011′s record numbers.

Often these types of lawsuits involved a consumer plaintiff suing a credit industry player such as a bank, credit reporting agency (or some other form of consumer reporting agency), or a collection agency. The allegations can rage from reasonable procedures to permissible purpose violations (improper access) to re-investigation issues.

  • A big part of how ethical credit repair works, is demanding that our clients rights under federal laws are not violated. Collection agencies have no problem threatening to sue our clients for the money that they are trying to collect, so basically we demand for our clients that the collection agencies: 
1. irrefutably prove that the debt they are trying to collect belongs to the client. 
2. that they have proof of ownership or the proper legal assignment of the right to collect the debt. 

If the collection agencies just send a duplicate statement of what they had sent previously, or a "screen shot" from their computer showing that anyone can type information into their database, they did not comply with what the client requested by exercising their rights provided by the FDCPA. Refusal to comply gives the client the right to sue for damages.

If the credit bureaus and original creditors refuse to comply with the clients rights under the FCRA, it is the exact same result. If any entity violates our clients rights under federal law - they deserve to get litigated against.

At Credit Restoration Associates, we build the paper trail for our legal team for both FCRA and FDCPA violation lawsuits. 

Our legal team is available when the "hammer" needs to be pulled out to demand enforcement of the clients rights. We even have access to an expert witness with over 100 cases under his belt with victories in: credit report damage, credit score damage and credit reputation damages.

Call us today for an absolutely free credit consultation and credit report review and see if we might be able to help your situation: Toll Free: 800-648-5157.

NEXT POST:  The Credit Score That You See is NOT the Same as Lenders See

Visit our Website 

Back to the CRA blog homepage:
Credit Repair Va:
CRA Resources:
Credit Repair:
About CRA:

Thursday, March 8, 2012

Can Your "Employment Credit Score" Hurt Your Chances At Getting A Job?


By Robert Linkonis Sr.


I’ve often defined and called out the "Myth of Credit score and Employment" as the Unicorn of the credit world—a lot of people have heard of this, but nobody has actually ever seen a case where a credit score caused an applicant to be denied employment on this factor alone ...

In trying to dispel this idea altogether, I have noted many cases - all exposed in this blog - but Suze Orman's recent campaign to promote her new Prepaid Debit Card – in which she eludes to the fact that not having a FICO score could cost consumers a job...  Whaaaaaaaaaa ???

Suzi and I have never been friends, but -- what is she telling her prospective customers?

Here's the truth: Credit scores are never sold by credit reporting agencies for employment screening purposes.

Here's how you can be sure: The only three agencies authorized to distribute credit reports are  – Equifax, Experian and Transunion. Because you can't get a credit score without first getting a report from those agencies, employers would have to go through those companies if they wanted your credit score.

And all three agencies all said the same thing. *** They do not sell credit scores to employers for screening purposes.

If affirmation from the national credit reporting agencies are not enough to convince you that credit scores ARE NOT used by employers,  the Consumer Data Industry Association, the trade association of the credit reporting agencies, confirmed the same thing: There is NO credit score provided in a credit report pulled for  employment screening.

Experian says that: "The employment credit report includes much of the information about your loans and credit cards that is listed in your credit report". BUT NOT YOUR CREDIT SCORE!!!

To pull your credit report and score, one must be a  - "financial institution" and have a -  "permissible purpose" to purchase a consumer credit report.   AN EMPLOYER IS NOT A FINANCIAL INSTITUTION WITH PERMISSIBLE PURPOSE to pull a consumer credit report that includes your credit score.  

Bottom line - a potential employer CAN pull your credit report and see all of your credit history - both positive and negative. They can use this information to make a decision on whether or not to hire you, but they can not see your credit score.

Please call anytime with all questions and ...  Always feel free to "LIKE" Credit Restoration Associates on Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/Financed1

 








Back to the CRA blog homepage:
Credit Repair Va:
CRA Resources:
Credit Repair:
About CRA:

Monday, February 13, 2012

Can Debt Collectors Contact You via Social Media?

.
Fantastic strategies to preempt unwanted calls or other communication from collectors:

The Fair Debt Collections Practices Act (FDCPA) was designed to protect consumers against abusive practices by the debt collections industry. But when FDCPA took effect in 1978, few people could have anticipated how Facebook and Twitter would infiltrate our daily lives. In recent years, a handful of lawsuits by consumers who were allegedly contacted by collectors through social media have brought the issue to light.

One strategy collections agencies use, according to Michelle Dunn, a 24-year veteran of the debt-collection industry and author of The Guide to Getting Paid, is to set up a fake profile and try to friend someone (however, a few states have laws against online impersonation). "If you look like a really good-looking girl, a lot of people would accept a friendship even if they don't really know the person," she explains.

Dunn says she discourages this practice in her webinars on social media and collections. "I just tell them to use common sense," she says. "Don't pretend you're someone you're not. There shouldn't be any interaction."

FDCPA doesn't explicitly forbid collectors from, say, posting on your Facebook wall or tweeting your relatives to ask about your whereabouts. But according to Craig Thor Kimmel, an Ambler, Penn.-based consumer attorney who handles collections issues, the act's intent is clear. "A debt collector that posts about your debt on social media would be violating this statute very clearly because that privacy is compromised," he says.

Despite this, collectors can use information found on a social network to contact you in other ways. "Right now, the normal pre-social media method would be to use the address off the loan documents and statements, but if the consumer is unwilling to respond to the contacts or is at a different location, they can certainly use social media as way of finding the consumer," says John Ulzheimer, president of Consumer Education at SmartCredit.com.

Experts suggest the following strategies to preempt unwanted calls or other communication from collectors:

1. Respond within 30 days of receiving a collections letter. For many people who receive a letter from a collections agency, the impulse is simply to bury their heads and ignore it. That's a mistake, according to Ulzheimer. "You can eliminate all communication," he says. "All you have to do is send them a letter within 30 days and tell them, 'Do not contact me anymore through any method.' They can still sue you for the debt, so the act of collecting doesn't necessarily stop, but they can't send you emails or call you anymore."

If you actually owe the debt, he suggests offering a settlement so that it doesn't continue to follow you. Third-party agencies who've purchased the debt "don't have the same skin in the game as the original creditor, so you could offer some sort of reasonable settlement and be done with it."

2. Use those privacy settings. Dunn said she's shocked by the number of consumers whose Facebook profiles are set to completely public. "Even though I'm not your friend, I can see all your pictures," she says. Setting your profile to private reduces the likelihood that a collector could be eying your wall or photos.

3. Be selective about what you post. Social networks like Facebook can create a false sense of intimacy because you're communicating with friends. Even with a private profile, your friends' accounts could still get hacked or someone could be peeking over their shoulder, so it's smart to err on the side of under-disclosing.

Dunn says collectors use social media profiles to "look for the address or employment information. A lot of people put what their occupation is, where they work, cell phone numbers." For instance, when someone gets a new cell phone number, they'll sometimes post it on Facebook so friends can reach them. "I have to say if I was somebody who owed money, I probably wouldn't put [my cell number] online and make it public information," adds Dunn.

Most people know not to post their Social Security or credit card numbers, but many list their birth date. "To me, that's comical," says Ulzheimer. "If someone walked up to you off the street and asked your birth date, would you give it on the street? But you're gladly doing it on Facebook."

4. Don't accept friend requests from strangers. For reasons described earlier, don't approve requests from people you don't know. It could be a friend of a friend, but it could also be a collector or a spammer.

5. Skip the "like" button. Liking your bank or credit card company on Facebook may open the door to them collecting information about you that you haven't given them. How many people actually like their bank? To the extent that you like your bank, that's fine, but I'm not sure that you have to memorialize that by clicking that you like it on Facebook.

If despite these steps, a collector contacts you via a social media site, Kimmel suggests printing out the message or saving a screenshot to your computer to create a paper trial. "Once you have that, report the sender as spam on Facebook and file a grievance with the Federal Trade Commission," he suggests. The consumer could be entitled to up to $1,000 plus attorney fees and actual damages "if a debt collector engages in unauthorized debt collection contact, through, for example, social media," says Kimmel, adding that a consumer attorney could help the person seek redress.

***  Always feel free to "LIKE" Credit Restoration Associates on Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/Financed1








Back to the CRA blog homepage:
Credit Repair Va:
CRA Resources:
Credit Repair:
About CRA: